What penalty is assessed for a dismount landing that is too close to the beam?

What penalty is assessed for a dismount landing that is too close to the beam?

• A. Flat .1
• B. Flat .2
• C. Flat .3
• D. Flat .5

Answer: (A)

When a gymnast performs a dismount that lands too close to the beam, the appropriate penalty assessed is a flat .1 deduction. In gymnastics, specific deductions are outlined for various errors that occur during routines, and a landing that is deemed too close indicates a lack of control and precision. This particular deduction reflects a minor error in execution without significantly impacting the overall performance of the routine. Assessing a flat .1 penalty acknowledges the gymnast's attempt while signaling that there was a slight issue with spatial awareness or positioning during the dismount. This type of penalty is part of the scoring system designed to encourage mastery of skills and proper execution, reinforcing the importance of not only completing a routine but doing so with proper technique and control. The other potential deductions like flat .2, .3, or .5 would represent more significant errors or issues, which would not apply in this case of a dismount landing too close to the beam.

When a gymnast performs a dismount that lands too close to the beam, the appropriate penalty assessed is a flat .1 deduction. In gymnastics, specific deductions are outlined for various errors that occur during routines, and a landing that is deemed too close indicates a lack of control and precision. This particular deduction reflects a minor error in execution without significantly impacting the overall performance of the routine.

Assessing a flat .1 penalty acknowledges the gymnast's attempt while signaling that there was a slight issue with spatial awareness or positioning during the dismount. This type of penalty is part of the scoring system designed to encourage mastery of skills and proper execution, reinforcing the importance of not only completing a routine but doing so with proper technique and control. The other potential deductions like flat .2, .3, or .5 would represent more significant errors or issues, which would not apply in this case of a dismount landing too close to the beam.