What is the penalty for a balance beam routine that contains an acro flight series with D/E and an additional B/C flight with hand support?

What is the penalty for a balance beam routine that contains an acro flight series with D/E and an additional B/C flight with hand support?

• A. 0.1
• B. 0.2
• C. 0.15
• D. 0.3

Answer: (C)

The penalty for a balance beam routine that includes an acro flight series with a D or E value and an additional flight element that requires hand support, which is deemed a B or C value, is specifically assessed according to the code of points for gymnastics. In this situation, an additional flight element that requires hand support typically incurs a deduction due to the failure to perform the element without support, reflecting the gymnasts' reliance on that support as opposed to demonstrating pure flight skills. In this context, a deduction of 0.15 is standard for such a combination because the gymnast successfully performed a high-value acro flight series but then relied on hand support for the additional flight element instead of executing it without support. The observed combination of these elements leads judges to assign a 0.15 penalty, as it acknowledges the high-quality acro series while recognizing the flaw introduced by the additional B/C element. This balance between recognizing performance and penalizing the lack of skill advancement is essential in maintaining the integrity of the judging standards for Level 10 gymnastics routines.

The penalty for a balance beam routine that includes an acro flight series with a D or E value and an additional flight element that requires hand support, which is deemed a B or C value, is specifically assessed according to the code of points for gymnastics. In this situation, an additional flight element that requires hand support typically incurs a deduction due to the failure to perform the element without support, reflecting the gymnasts' reliance on that support as opposed to demonstrating pure flight skills.

In this context, a deduction of 0.15 is standard for such a combination because the gymnast successfully performed a high-value acro flight series but then relied on hand support for the additional flight element instead of executing it without support. The observed combination of these elements leads judges to assign a 0.15 penalty, as it acknowledges the high-quality acro series while recognizing the flaw introduced by the additional B/C element. This balance between recognizing performance and penalizing the lack of skill advancement is essential in maintaining the integrity of the judging standards for Level 10 gymnastics routines.