What is the deduction for a routine featuring one pass with two saltos (one a D) and a second pass with a single D salto?

What is the deduction for a routine featuring one pass with two saltos (one a D) and a second pass with a single D salto?

• A. 0
• B. 0.05
• C. 0.1
• D. 0.15

Answer: (C)

In gymnastics, when evaluating a routine, judges look at the difficulty of the skill elements performed as well as the execution. For a routine featuring one pass with two saltos—one classified as a D-level skill—and a second pass with a single D salto, the evaluation considers both the combination of elements and the total number of difficulty values executed. In this case, having two D saltos in the routine is commendable for difficulty, but the inclusion of a second pass with a single D salto may lead to a deduction based on how the gymnasts' skills are combined and executed within the routine. Typically, a penalty is assessed for certain combinations of passes or lack of connection between elements, especially when it comes to the level of difficulty expected at Level 10. The deduction of 0.1 is justified because the routine, while containing high-level elements, may not fulfill all the requirements for connections or variety in the difficulty of the skill execution, thereby leading to the deduction being applied. Thus, in this context, the discrepancy in element combinations and the way they fulfill routine requirements contribute to the determination of the appropriate deduction, making 0.1 the correct answer for this scenario.

In gymnastics, when evaluating a routine, judges look at the difficulty of the skill elements performed as well as the execution. For a routine featuring one pass with two saltos—one classified as a D-level skill—and a second pass with a single D salto, the evaluation considers both the combination of elements and the total number of difficulty values executed.

In this case, having two D saltos in the routine is commendable for difficulty, but the inclusion of a second pass with a single D salto may lead to a deduction based on how the gymnasts' skills are combined and executed within the routine.

Typically, a penalty is assessed for certain combinations of passes or lack of connection between elements, especially when it comes to the level of difficulty expected at Level 10. The deduction of 0.1 is justified because the routine, while containing high-level elements, may not fulfill all the requirements for connections or variety in the difficulty of the skill execution, thereby leading to the deduction being applied.

Thus, in this context, the discrepancy in element combinations and the way they fulfill routine requirements contribute to the determination of the appropriate deduction, making 0.1 the correct answer for this scenario.